You are the owner of this page.
A1 A1
Jim Lee, Sioux City Journal 

Chris and Sue Stanek said their Sioux City home had become too quiet with just two of their seven children still at home. After years of discussing becoming foster parents, they were licensed in September and helped fill the growing need for foster parents in western Iowa.


Justin Wan, Sioux City Journal 

Knife River employees pose for a photo on Nov. 2. The asphalt and concrete paving contractor has donated to the Journal's Mr. Goodfellow charity.


Iowa
Officials: some Iowa Legislature anti-harassment policies may be lacking

Anderson

DES MOINES | As the fallout from sexual harassment allegations and a $1.7 million settlement continues at the Iowa Capitol, state lawmakers are trying to determine the best path forward.

In the Iowa Senate, where the alleged harassment transpired, leaders are weighing whether to create a human resources director position to help oversee future complaints.

The Iowa House has already made that decision and plans to hire a human resources director. A timeline has not been set.

One area a new human resources director could examine is the House and Senate’s current policies on sexual harassment training.

In some areas, the chambers are lacking compared to other states.

State lawmakers are exploring their options in the wake of sexual harassment allegations made by Kirsten Anderson, a former Iowa Senate Republican caucus staff member who sued the state after she was fired in 2013. Anderson claimed she was fired in retaliation for reporting incidents of sexual harassment; Bill Dix, the leader of the Iowa Senate Republicans, does not dispute Anderson’s claims that she and others were sexually harassed, but Dix also maintains Anderson was fired for poor work performance.

Anderson testified in front of a jury in July. One Senate Republican staff member who was cited by Anderson in court documents as the source of much of the alleged harassment resigned in September. A few weeks later, a jury ruled in favor of Anderson, and the state settled the case for $1.75 million.

The Senate actually has the stronger of the chambers’ sexual harassment training policies. In the Senate, sexual harassment training is held every year during the first few weeks of the legislative session, and is required for all senators and staff every two-year general assembly.

In odd-numbered years (just after an election), all senators, full-time and part-time staff take the training. In even-numbered years, any new senators or staff take the training.

The training is a one-hour session conducted by staff from the Iowa Civil Rights Commission.

The Iowa House policy, on the other hand, requires no in-person sexual harassment training for legislators, who are required only to sign and say they read a two-page document that reviews House policy against sexual harassment. Legislators must sign and submit the document to the House’s Chief Clerk every two-year general assembly.

Newly hired House clerks — assistants that work for the legislators — take part in a harassment prevention training class at the beginning of each legislative session, and House pages — low-level aides that run errands for legislators and clerks — receive training from House staff during orientation.

Starting in December, all legislators and staff also will be asked to review a slide show provided by the state’s Department of Administrative Services. Each employee will print a certificate and submit it to his or her supervisor.

The House also plans to bolster its ability to respond to potential sexual harassment claims by hiring a human resources director. The new director will investigate employee complaints and concerns and review policies and recommend changes.

The director will also perform typical human resources functions, such as writing job descriptions, assisting with the hiring and orientation of new employees and assisting with hiring and firing procedures.

“The House will continue with the hiring of a human resources professional to assist legislative employees. I believe that this is the right decision,” House Speaker Linda Upmeyer, a Republican from Clear Lake, said in a statement. “A human resources professional, dedicated to that role, will provide expertise and continuity in an increasingly complex field in order to provide the best working environment we can for our employees. The Iowa House will always look for opportunities to make improvements.”

Dix has come under criticism for postponing the decision to hire a human resources director for the Senate — he said he wants to get more external input in order to determine the best possible policy — and for saying Senate Republicans will not publish the findings of their internal investigation. Dix said he is not releasing the investigation results out of respect for the privacy of those who were interviewed.

“From my perspective, I want to be completely open and transparent. We want to make sure that whatever we do it has been done in the best possible way and the most accountable way,” Dix said this week.

Senate Republican staffers have not responded to an open records request from the Cedar Rapids Gazette for any documentation of the investigation.

Iowa Senate Minority Leader Janet Petersen said Senate Republicans should publish their findings.

“Releasing the findings of your internal investigation would be a first step in making sure the Legislature is a safe and welcoming environment for all employees, protecting Iowa taxpayers, and protecting the rights of those who raise concerns about harassment,” Petersen wrote in a letter to Dix.

While Anderson’s lawsuit shook the Iowa Capitol, the entire country is experiencing a wave of allegations of sexual harassment or assault after multiple media outlets reported Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein harassed or assaulted dozens of women. Others who have been accused in recent weeks include more in the movie and television industries, and prominent politicians.

Iowa’s is far from the only statehouse impacted as well. In the past month, women in at least 16 states have accused male state lawmakers of sexual assault or harassment. Only five of those states — California, Colorado, Kentucky, Oregon and Vermont — require all state lawmakers to attend regular anti-harassment training, according to a report by the Pew Charitable Trust’s Stateline.

In the other 11 states, anti-harassment training takes place only while training new legislators, only in one chamber, just once every five years, or not at all, according to the Stateline report.

At the federal level, Iowa’s senior Republican U.S. Senator, Chuck Grassley, helped make mandatory sexual harassment training on Capitol Hill.

Grassley pressed leaders on the Senate rules committee to make sexual harassment training mandatory for all offices, and joined roughly 20 senators in supporting a resolution that does just that. The resolution requires all lawmakers and staff complete the training within 60 days of starting work in the Senate and re-complete the training every two years.

“Comprehensive mandatory anti-harassment training will now be a critical component of how we show our employees they are valued, respected, and protected,” Grassley said in a statement.


Provided 

Hecht


Taylor


Anderson