Refinery's methane emissions nearly double

2010-12-16T09:55:00Z 2010-12-16T17:48:04Z Refinery's methane emissions nearly doubleBy Dave Dreeszen Sioux City Journal

ELK POINT, S.D. -- Methane emissions from the Hyperion Energy Center would be nearly twice as great as a previous estimate, developers of the proposed oil refinery and power plant in rural Union County have told state regulators.

Hyperion Refining now projects the energy center to annually emit 979 tons of methane, a greenhouse gas, up from 498 tons the company projected in an October filing with the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

The revision came after the Texas-based company adding data from the refinery's coking units, which would turn a refinery byproduct into hydrogen, steam and electricity to power the refinery.

In its 54-page filing with the DENR in October, the company "inadvertently omitted the coke drum steam vents," which are a potential source of methane emissions, Hyperion project manager Colin Campbell said in a letter posted on the DENR website this week.

Methane, an odorless gas, is considered a more potent greenhouse gas, trapping heat in the atmosphere at a rate 20 times greater than CO2 over a 100-year period, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The greenhouse gas analysis was conducted for Hyperion by RTP Environmental Associates, a Raleigh, N.C.-based environmental consulting firm.

Hyperion spokesman Eric Williams noted Thursday the latest revisions only marginally increases the energy center's projected carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, from 16.93 million tons to 16.94 million tons annually.

"I calculate that on a CO2e basis, the increase is 0.06 percent, and if calculated on a mass basis (not as C02e), the increase is 0.003 percent," Williams said in an email.

Kirk Rombough, an air quality engineer for the DENR, said Hyperion brought the omission of the coke drum steam vents to the agency's attention.

The most recent filing is the latest chapter in Hyperion's bid to obtain a state air quality permit required to construct its $10 billion refinery just north of Elk Point.


The state Board of Minerals and Environment approved the permit on Aug. 20, 2009, but the Sierra Club and two local groups, Save Union County and Citizens Opposed to Oil Pollution, quickly filed a lawsuit seeking to overturn the decision on the grounds that it violates the federal Clean Air Act and other environmental rules. Hyperion also filed its own, more limited, appeal, asking that the board's decision on a carbon monoxide limit be overturned.

In June, a 6th Circuit Court judge put the appeal on hold and granted Hyperion's request to reopen the permitting in order to delay the required start of construction by 18 months, from February to August 2012. During the delay, the company amended its design and application to reflect various EPA rules adopted after the air permit was approved.

Most notably, the EPA adopted new regulations under the Clean Air Act that require refineries, power plants and factories that emit at least 100,000 tons of greenhouse gases annually to use best available technology to control the emissions.

Hyperion had argued it would not be subject to the "tailoring rules,'' which are scheduled to take effect Jan. 2, because the state board had earlier approved its air permit.

South Dakota is among the states challenging the EPA's greenhouse gas rules. Rombough referred addition questions about the legal challenge to the state's attorney genearl's office.

Rombough said DENR staff is still reviewing Hyperion's amended application for its air permit. The agency will be required to take additional public comments. It's uncertain how soon the Board of Minerals and Environment will take up the issue again, he said.

The air permit is among a number of permits and approvals Hyperion needs to start construction on the refinery, which would turn 400,000 barrels of Canadian tar sands per day into low-sulfur gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel.

Despite the regulatory delays, Hyperion has insisted it will maintain its current construction timeline for the energy center, which would be built on a 3,292-acre site just north of Elk Point in Union County.

The largest project in Siouxland history would create an average of 4,500 construction jobs over four years, and around 1,800 permanent jobs.


Copyright 2015 Sioux City Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Activate subscription button gif

Business Search

Latest Offers

View More

Featured Businesses

View More

Community Calendar

Calendar Sponsor

Top Jobs

Clinical Director


Insurance Inspector

Dental Assistant Opportunity


Midwest CDL Drivers FT or PT

Warehouse Material Handler

Human Resource Manager

Full-time HR Director

Office Cleaner Wanted

Direct Support Professionals


Now Hiring

Dietary Aide/Cook

Now Hiring

Certified Teacher

Assistant Controller - Construction

Experienced Diesel Technician


Truck Driver

Breakfast Cook

Now Hiring

PT Teller

Chair Rental Available

CNA/CMA & Cook


Purchasing Manager

Now Hiring

Night Shift Printing


Part Time RN

Now Hiring

Van Drivers




Poll: What is your grilling fuel preference?

View Results