You are the owner of this page.
A1 A1
Crime-and-courts
top story
Judge recuses himself from Sioux City hotel room murder case

SIOUX CITY -- A judge has removed himself from presiding over a Sioux City murder case because he may have personal knowledge of the defendant's psychological history, an issue that may be raised as a defense.

District Judge Zachary Hindman issued the order late Thursday, saying that while serving as Jordan Henry's defense attorney during a probation revocation case two years ago, he "may or may not have obtained personal knowledge of facts that are or may become at issue" in the murder case and that he must recuse himself.

Chief District Judge Duane Hoffmeyer will assign the case to another judge.

Henry, 29, of Sioux City, is accused of strangling Elizabeth Bockholt in a Sioux City hotel room on Jan. 24 and then setting fire to the room. Henry pleaded not guilty earlier this week in Woodbury County District Court to first-degree murder and first-degree arson.

Hindman canceled a Friday hearing in which attorneys were to discuss whether Hindman should recuse himself.

First Assistant Woodbury County Attorney Mark Campbell on Wednesday filed a memorandum in which he said that Hindman should recuse himself because it appears possible that Henry's defense team may use a psychological or intoxication defense in the case.

Hindman, who was appointed to the bench last summer, represented Henry in March 2017. Campbell said in his memorandum that Hindman's representation dealt with Henry's psychological condition, and he could have obtained information that could be relevant to Henry's murder case, if a psychological or intoxication defense is sought. Campbell said it's not known what kind of psychological information, if any, Hindman received while representing Henry or if it would help or hinder Henry in the current case.

Hindman

"In either instance, the court's rulings in the current case could be viewed as not being impartial due to the court's prior representation of Henry" and would violate the Iowa Code of Judicial Conduct, Campbell wrote.

Hindman said in his order that his own analysis of the facts "tracks with the analysis" Campbell used in his memorandum.

Public defender Billy Oyadare did not file any opinions about Hindman's recusal.

In November 2016, a jury found Henry guilty of driving a stolen vehicle, and he was placed on probation. Henry's probation was revoked in 2017, when Hindman was representing him, after Henry was charged with stealing a car after leaving an inpatient drug treatment facility in Colfax, Iowa. Hindman did not represent Henry at trial.

Henry was sentenced to five years in prison, and he was released on parole on Jan. 16, eight days before Bockholt's death.

Firefighters and police found Bockholt's body after responding to the fire at the Wingate by Wyndham, 4716 Southern Hills Drive. According to court documents, Bockholt, 40, of Hinton, Iowa, and Henry had a romantic relationship before Henry was sentenced to prison, and she voluntarily met him at the hotel the night she died. Henry was identified on surveillance video and by witnesses who saw him leaving the scene just after the fire.

Henry is scheduled to stand trial on July 9. If found guilty of first-degree murder, Henry would face a mandatory sentence of life in prison without parole. First-degree arson carries a 25-year prison sentence.


Govt-and-politics
top story
Iowa legislators consider work requirements for Medicaid, food aid

DES MOINES --- Work requirements and other stipulations for some Iowa recipients of Medicaid services and food assistance programs are being considered by Iowa lawmakers.

Myriad legislative proposals were presented this week at the Iowa Capitol, including a number during a flurry of subcommittee meetings on Thursday.

Many of the bills were introduced by Jason Schultz, a Republican in the Iowa Senate from Schleswig, and written with the guidance of a pair of national conservative think tanks, the Opportunity Solutions Project and the Foundation for Government Accountability.

“I hear constantly from constituents who are frustrated,” Schultz told reporters after the meetings. “They feel that they’re going to work every day, paying taxes, these taxes are going to people who are not going to work and could.”

Schultz-led Senate panels on Thursday gave initial approval to one bill that would require any Iowan on the food assistance program known as SNAP or food stamps be current on child support payments, and another that aims to guide jobless food assistance recipients with school-aged children toward programs designed to connect them with a job.

Opponents of the child support bill expressed concerns with withholding food assistance for any low-income Iowan, even one who is behind on child support payments.

“Taking away food assistance would prevent them from meeting basic needs,” said MaryNelle Trefz, with the nonprofit Child and Family Policy Center. “And it may make it more challenging for that person to make their child support payments.”

Schultz said he considered the proposal “a relatively minor ask of the taxpayer,” referring to the taxpayer funding that supports the food assistance program.

During discussion on the bill to install work requirements for food assistance recipients, Schultz said he is open to a program touted by the United Way that aims to help Iowans on assistance programs get job training. Schultz approved the bill as written but said he was open to amending it to create language to include the United Way program.

“If we can expand this program to every community college and nonprofits, we can specifically target the SNAP population to get the skills they need and better training to get the jobs they need,” said Dave Stone, with the United Way of Central Iowa.

A third bill, which would have required Iowans enrolled in the state’s version of Medicaid expansion to work or volunteer 20 hours per week, was shelved after Schultz said it could not yet be determined if it would apply to any Iowans. Because Iowa’s Medicaid expansion applied specifically to individuals with income between 100 percent and 133 percent of the federal poverty level, those individuals presumably already have a job since they have income.