Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Iowa lawmakers say 'life amendment' on track
top story

Iowa lawmakers say 'life amendment' on track

  • 0
{{featured_button_text}}
Iowa statehouse

The Iowa Capitol in Des Moines is shown in a July 2019 file photo.

Lawmakers and activists opposed to abortion rights say they are on track to put what they call a “Protect Life Amendment” asking voters to declare the Iowa Constitution does not provide a right to abortion on the statewide ballot as early as 2024.

Similar versions of the resolution have been advanced by Republicans in the Iowa Senate and Iowa House, and proponents say there is now agreement between the chambers on the wording of the proposal — which must be approved by two consecutive general assemblies before Iowa voters decide whether to amend the constitution.

The remaining question is when that will happen.

Steven Holt

Holt

“Whether we get it done this year or next year, you know, that doesn't change when it would go on the ballot,” said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Steve Holt, R-Denison. “We’ll get her done either this year or next year, but I can't predict which one.”

Holt understands that those opposed to abortion rights, as he is, want action now as the Legislature wraps up its 2021 session perhaps yet this week.

“We’ve worked hard to educate Iowans and also advocate to our legislators that we feel very strongly in getting the Protect Life Amendment passed this session,” said Maggie DeWitte, executive director of Iowans for Life. “It's better for us to get it passed this session so we can work on some other important pro-life and pro-family bills in the next legislative session.”

Jake Chapman

Chapman

The delay is not due to a lack of support, said Senate President Jake Chapman, R-Adel, but rather because “whenever we’re talking about a constitutional amendment, we need to be very careful what we propose and get language right.”

Senate Joint Resolution 2, approved 30-17 on a party-line vote read: “To defend the dignity of all human life, and to protect mothers and unborn children from efforts to expand abortion even to the day of birth, we the people of the State of Iowa declare that this Constitution shall not be construed to recognize, grant, or secure a right to abortion or to require the public funding of abortion.”

The House, Holt said, took a “simpler is better” approach. House Joint Resolution 5 said: “To defend and protect unborn children, we the people of the State of Iowa declare that this Constitution does not recognize, grant, or secure a right to abortion or require the public funding of abortion.”

Support Local Journalism

Your membership makes our reporting possible.
{{featured_button_text}}

“The House sort of concluded that the shorter the better, maybe the easier it will be to understand, while the Senate was concerned about giving a little bit more information,” Holt said. He and Chapman believe a compromise has been reached using language from both chambers’ proposals.

For abortion rights activists, however, the compromise on language won’t alter the bill’s intent.

“No matter what the language says, I'm reading it as laying the groundwork to ban abortion if Roe v. Wade is overturned,” said Jamie Burch Elliott of Planned Parenthood Advocates.

Iowa anti-abortion rights advocates are following the Tennessee playbook, Burch said. A similar state constitutional amendment was approved there in 2014. Since then, Tennessee legislators have passed a series of abortion restrictions that show “the clear goal is to either ban abortion altogether or restrict abortion so much that it is inaccessible,” Burch said.

Just as in Tennessee, the Iowa amendment is being sold to voters as a way to restore a balance of power between the legislative and judicial branches.

It would correct a “mistake” the Iowa Supreme Court made in 2018 when it ruled the state constitution guaranteed a right to abortion, DeWitte said. “What these judges did was even more extreme than Roe v. Wade,” she said.

DeWitte said the amendment will “allow our elected representatives and the people of Iowa to make decisions about the health and safety and well-being of its citizens.” Without it, there is no way to prevent late-term abortions “even up to the point of birth.”

Burch doesn’t buy the “balance of power” argument.

“All you have to do is look at all of the other attempts at banning abortion or chipping away at abortion rights over just the last handful of years in Iowa,” Burch said. She pointed to attempts to ban abortions after 20 weeks, a variety of waiting periods and other restrictions. “So to say that that's not the goal of this bill, I don't believe that for a moment.”

There’s little support among Iowa voters for the constitutional amendment, Burch said, pointing to polling that found only a third of Iowans would vote for it.

DeWitte said her organization’s polling found that when Iowans understand the amendment “is really about preventing unelected judges from forcing late-term abortion and taxpayer-funded abortion on Iowans” they will vote for the amendment.

Before it gets to the voters, the House and Senate must approve the resolution. That won’t happen without a fight from lawmakers in favor of abortion rights and attempts to amend the resolution to create constitutional protection for abortion in the cases of rape, incest and preserving the life of the mother.

0
0
0
0
0

Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News